is a blog about design, technology and culture written by Khoi Vinh, and has been more or less continuously published since December 2000 in New York City. Khoi is currently Principal Designer at Adobe. Previously, Khoi was co-founder and CEO of Mixel (acquired in 2013), Design Director of The New York Times Online, and co-founder of the design studio Behavior, LLC. He is the author of “How They Got There: Interviews with Digital Designers About Their Careers”and “Ordering Disorder: Grid Principles for Web Design,” and was named one of Fast Company’s “fifty most influential designers in America.” Khoi lives in Crown Heights, Brooklyn with his wife and three children.
Please refer to the advertising and sponsorship page for inquiries.
+
So, I have to know if you post this just because you love the look, or due to some deeper desire for the format?
I want something more like this for the old-fashioned control setup. I still wish I could twist (say) the shutter speed dial, and know that a click is a stop, and it will stay there. Sometimes, I even shoot in total darkness (yes, I have night vision adapters) where it’s impractical or stupid to look at an LCD, etc. to change settings.
But the review gives credence to my worries: It’s a half measure. Too many digital-centric controls still. Too many fussy buttons. Not mechanical enough.
I think a lot of machine-era design was very, very well thought out and the pace of innovation was spot on when they designed the F, or FM, FG, etc. Nothing wrong with that interaction to me, at all.
Really cool, but it looks heavy. I couldn’t see a pro using one of these. They’re more concerned with speed and weight rather than the aesthetics of their gear.
I love the look of the Df, and I want one badly. I’ve been shooting with a D3 for many years now. I’m tired of the weight. (Gabe, there may be some valid criticisms of the Df, but one of them is certainly *not* its weight. It’s a very light camera body for its power.)